|
South elevation
|
|
South elevation sketch
|
Armed with a sketch design and Archicentre's
approval to proceed, the architects moved onto stage 4 of
the project. A meeting with the City of Melbourne Town Planning
Department was arranged.

Even though it was just a little taller
than the adjoining two storey Terrace House, the three storey
building was - according to the town planner - 'pushing'
the envelope too far. While the Town Planner had only minor
concerns he was convinced that the Heritage Advisor would
see the design as 'completely out of character' with a single
storey terrace site. He also believed the Carlton Residents
Association would raise strong objections to a three storey
building. The architects resolved with the Town Planner
to keep to a two storey maximum height and to keep new construction
beyond/behind the existing ridge line.
The architect explains the revised scheme:
"Now, rather than an open back yard we decided that an
internal light court along with a boundary skylight shaft
and first floor skylights would allow sufficient light into
the town house and would thus allow construction up to the
rear boundary. The rear boundary portion of the site could
then contain a carport at least and perhaps a roof deck
or additional habitable space.
A first floor bedroom was then located
over the carport with glazing to the north. In addition,
a glass shaft to the west side of the first floor bedroom
with paved flooring was designed to be part of the bedroom
yet have the feel of an open balcony space. This would allow
more light into the bedroom and also the first floor living
room beyond.
Satisfied with the redesign, the architect
scheduled another meeting with the Town Planner, the Heritage
Consultant, Carlton Residents Association and neighbours.
The architect also contacted the owners of the adjoining
property.
The City of Melbourne Heritage Consultant
believed that any change to the existing roof fabric would
be out of character with the existing building and that
a single storey only development, essentially confined within
the existing building envelope was the preferred design
solution for the site. The Town Planner was happy to consider
the current design but felt that if neighbours objected
to overshadowing he would find it difficult to approve the
design.
The Carlton Residents Association felt
that a two storey wall on the lane boundary would be intrusive
into the lane, too out of character and would create over
shadowing of neighbouring sites. The Architect could have
argued against this as a two storey wall already exists
in the lane to the north-west and the degree of overshadowing
was not excessive. However, objections along these lines
could force the entire project to VCAT with potential delays
as a result. Better to give some ground and compromise,
in this case, in the hope of getting the objectors on side
and moving forward. A third scheme was therefore produced.
T2 north elevation
|
North elevation sketch
|
T1 north elevation
|
Before proceeding with this Stage another
meeting was held with the City of Melbourne to gauge the
reaction of the Planning Officer. There remained some concern
over the sightlines and how much of the proposed house could
be visible from the diagonal view.
The Architect looked at the design in
a larger scale format with cross sections through various
parts of the house. A meeting was held with a Landscape
Architect to explore options for the rear garden and light
well. Ideas included a shallow water basin with a textured
base, crude steel furniture recalling the days of homemade
outside garden furniture of the Italian migrants who lived
in many of the local houses post-WW II., perhaps a steel
sunscreen made from mesh on varying height poles. Removal
of the rear fence was also suggested, or gates that opened
right up with views of the fence across the lane, which
could perhaps be decorated as an extension of the garden.
Privacy was also a major factor, especially
overlooking into the neighbour's yard. Interesting side
screens could address this problem. As art and colour are
part of Carlton's heritage - colours were a fitting and
exciting treatment for the rear exterior, framed by structural
elements and applied to different wall planes and surfaces.
Developing
the Design Fact Sheet 
|