Further Questions & Answers
2
Homework
The
following questions and answers are applicable to Victoria.
Edited
versions of these articles appear in the occasional Homework column
in the Wednesday edition of Domain, The Age.
Asbestos
Q:
I have a large bungalow in my back garden that probably dates back to
the 1950s. It seems sound enough so I want to convert it into a playhouse
for the kids. How should I remove the damaged AC sheet from the walls.
A:
You shouldn't - asbestos removal is a DDIY job …. don't do it youself.
Many
materials considered safe in the past have since been found to be health
hazards - asbestos is one of them. Asbestos was incorporated into a
variety of building products prior to 1983, the most common being asbestos
cement sheet or "fibro". AC
sheet was commonly used as wall cladding, roofing, interior panelling
and eaves lining. The asbestos in these products is usually embedded
in the sheet but if the sheets start to weather or break the harmful
fibres can be released. In
this case, removal of the sheeting would probably be wise, however,
it should only be done by professionals. They will wear protective clothing,
take care not to break the sheets and securely wrap them for proper
disposal.
The
best advice? Check out the roofing to see if it needs replacement as
well and get three quotes from licensed asbestos removal contractors.
If the building is powered ask a registered electrical contractor to
check the wiring and also test the interior paintwork for lead content.
If in doubt ask an Architect.
When
the earth moves
Q:
How should I repair a crack that has appeared in the side wall of my
house? It is a brick house and I think it was built in the 1920's.
A:
Cracks in brickwork aren't necessarily an indication of imminent disaster...they're
often a sign that the earth has moved for you!
Soil
movement is caused by changes in its moisture content and is more evident
in inland clays than in coastal sands. Whilst excessive moisture (caused
by an undetected leaking pipe, for example) causes soil to swell, drying
causes it to shrink and our continuing drought is the cause of many
a recent crack.
Aided
by increasingly thirsty trees, it's slowly drying out our soil and causing
movement beneath our homes, particularly affecting older building stock.
Thankfully, these days we're better at predicting soil behaviour than
we were in the "good old days" - we design new homes for local conditions
using techniques such as pier and beam footings or movement control
joints.
According
to accepted industry standards, cracks less than 5mm wide aren't necessarily
cause for concern, however larger cracks can mean some reconstruction
work. If the crack is a result of foundation shrinkage it may well close
up when the soil becomes moist again. This will probably occur naturally
during the wetter months, however you can hurry it along by re-hydrating
the area using a drip-watering system (be sure to check your local water
restrictions first!). If the area around the base of the wall is paved,
consider replacing the paving with porous material or planting - this
will ensure that water permeates the soil rather than running off.
Above
all, don't fill the crack with mortar - use a flexible, exterior grade
sealant. If and when the foundation soil does swell back into its natural
state the brickwork will want to move back into place and an inflexible
filler will simply induce a crack elsewhere. Alternatively, just measure
it and keep an eye on it to see if it's getting better or worse. If
it doesn't close up or if it gets bigger, it's time to seek some professional
advice - ask an architect.
Grey
power
Q:
I want to re-use the water from my laundry on the garden. What is the
best way to do it?
A:
During the last year or so Victorians have enthusiastically embraced
the idea of waste water re-use. The pressure on our water reserves continues
to be significant (as a builder said to me last year "...we'll be drinking
mud if it doesn't rain soon!") and any action by home owners to conserve
water is commendable.
Having
said this, forethought and planning is important when considering the
use of what is really contaminated water. As a developed city, Melbourne
has sophisticated water supply and disposal systems in which millions
(perhaps billions) of dollars has been invested over many decades. The
money isn't spent on a whim - it's a matter of ensuring public health
and safety.
Firstly,
some definitions..."grey water" is waste water from showers, baths,
hand-basins, spas, sinks, troughs, washing machines and dishwashers,
whilst "black water" is waste water from toilets, urinals and bidets.
Both
types of water carry contaminants including detergents, dirt, chemicals,
food particles, grease and, in the case of black water, faecal matter
(the less said about this the better!). Black water is clearly unsuitable
for re-use without extensive treatment, however grey water can be re-used
if appropriate precautions are taken.
Clearly
a properly designed and constructed collection, storage, treatment and
reticulation system is preferable, however a simple and relatively inexpensive
"diversion" system can be effective, bearing in mind the following guidelines:
*
Only divert low risk grey water such as shower, bath, basin and laundry
rinse water
* Don't use grey water on leaf vegetables or vegetables that are to
be eaten raw (consider this next time you're enjoying a home grown salad!)
* Don't store grey water for more than 24 hours
* Don't allow grey water to pond and only use it during warm, dry weather
* Ensure that the system can't block or that the waste water will discharge
into the sewer if it does
* Don't allow pets or children to come into contact with it
* Don't allow it to enter storm water drains
* Watch what's happening to the area you are "grey watering"
Above
all, make sure no waste water runs or seeps on to your neighbours property
(they may not share your passion for water conservation), check with
your local Council before you do anything and involve a licensed plumber
in the installation.
Of
course, the best way to conserve water is to use less, but that's another
story.
The
best advice? Do what you can afford...if you're not sure, ask an architect.
Out
of the shadows
Q:
My wife and I want to put a side extension on our house. Are you able
to tell me a formula for working out overshadowing on September 22nd
at 9am and 3pm?
A: This is a fair bit more specific than most
of the questions we get, but it's another good one. It sounds to me
as though someone has alerted you to one of the key objectives of ResCode...either
that, or you have an uncommon interest in sun shading!
Amongst
many other requirements, ResCode states that buildings should not "unreasonably
overshadow existing secluded private open space". The open space referred
to is usually that of a neighbour, but open space on your own property
can come under consideration if you live in a unit, for example, or
on a small allotment.
It
goes on to stipulate that at least 40 square metres of the space should
be able to enjoy at least 5 hours of sunlight between 9am and 3pm on
September 22nd (the equinox).
The
logic (as far as I can see) is that if sunlight is available to an area
of open space in September, then it will penetrate the space during
summer when the sun is higher in the sky. The extent to which it penetrates
during the winter months depends upon the configuration of the space,
but (surprise, surprise) ResCode is a step ahead. In September, the
area lit by the sun must be at least 3 metres wide - this helps to ensure
that even the longest winter shadows shouldn't completely cover the
area.
If the requirements sound complicated, try designing a building around
them! It often requires a careful balance of boundary setback, wall
height and roof pitch that can generate some interesting forms...
Of
course, there are times when it can be impractical or even impossible
to comply with the overshadowing guidelines, in which case an application
can be made to Council for some concession. This can mean the preparation
of a comprehensive submission that may require - and here's the thing
- consent from the neighbour.
As
far as a formula is concerned, shadows are determined by the location
of a site, the time of year, the time of day and the height of a wall.
In Melbourne on September 22nd the suns altitude is about 35 degrees
above the horizon at 9am and again at 3pm. In the morning, the sun's
rays come from 59 degrees east of north and in the afternoon they come
from 59 degrees west of north.
Armed
with this information, a drawing board and an adjustable set square
you can plot the shadow cast by any building on the day. Alternatively,
you can activate the appropriate command on your PC if you have access
to computer-aided drafting software.
Then
again, you could ask an architect...
On
the outside
Q:
What are your thoughts on outdoor entertaining areas?
A:
As I write this, it's one of those drizzly Melbourne days on which everything
is bluestone grey and the last thing on anyone's mind is alfresco dining!
Nevertheless,
a contemporary Melbourne lifestyle demands a venue for outdoor living
and an exterior entertaining area is high on the list of most home-builders
and renovators. They can be expansive poolside terraces or pocket-handkerchief
courtyards, elevated or at ground level and for group entertaining or
quiet contemplation. Whatever the purpose, the key feature of a well-designed
outdoor living area is sensible orientation and protection from the
elements.
A
northerly orientation is generally the most desirable however an eastern
aspect is also pleasant in the mornings, although it will be shaded
in the afternoons. A western orientation is ideal for growing cacti
and a southerly one for growing mushrooms...human rarely flourish in
either.
Care
must still be taken to shield even a north-facing deck or courtyard
from the summer sun. A roof, a sail or a pergola will generally do the
trick, however anything permanent might exclude the sun when you want
it most. Deciduous planting (a grape vine, for instance) can be helpful
as it will allow the sun to penetrate during the cooler months, as will
an operable roof system or retractable shades. Protection from late
afternoon summer sun can really only be achieved using a wall, vertical
screening or planting.
Another
important consideration is the relationship between the interior and
the exterior of the house. If the purpose of the outdoor area is to
accommodate a 12-person barbeque, then circulation between the kitchen,
the living area and perhaps the property entry should be considered.
If it's to be a secluded 2-person courtyard then access and views from
the rest of the property should be controlled. In this sense, an outdoor
living area should be regarded as much a part of a home as a bedroom
or a bathroom and as carefully planned - if the area is likely to be
a noise source it's probably inappropriate outside a nursery or a study.
It's
also worth thinking about the level of the area in relation to the floor
of the house and the garden. A paved courtyard at ground level will
relate well to the garden however proper drainage and convenient access
from an elevated house require some forward planning. A raised deck,
by contrast, will separate the house from the garden but will create
a smooth, step-free transition between indoors and outdoors.
An
elevated deck may even enable views to be enjoyed, although if it is
more than 800mm above the ground a view into your neighbour's garden
must be prevented. If it's a metre or more above the ground it needs
a balustrade around the perimeter to stop people toppling off - this
may need careful consideration to avoid compromising a view.
Finally,
a new outdoor living area may require a Building Permit or in some cases
a Planning Permit...if in doubt, ask an architect.
Renovator's
delights
Q:
We have an old home that's had several additions over the years. Is
it possible to renovate it ourselves to obtain a more cohesive style?
A:
Home renovation isn't a recent phenomenon - it's just become more glamorous
recently. Apart from the appeal of many older homes, they are usually
well-located and provide real opportunities for capital growth if carefully
handled.
Older
homes have often been altered or added to since they were originally
built. It's not unusual to see houses, particularly period cottages,
which have undergone several face-lifts over the years as families have
moved in and out, as lifestyles have changed and as repairs have become
necessary. A common sight is the "cascading skillion" - a series of
lean-to additions at the rear of a home with each roof tucked under
the eave of the previous one.
The
first priority of any renovator intending to retain previous additions
should be to ensure that they are safe. One in four of the homes inspected
by Archicentre has some form of illegal building evident - a low ceiling,
steep stairs or inadequate natural light or ventilation, for example.
It's
reasonable to assume that such work was done without the necessary permits
or inspections so the condition and adequacy of the structure, the wiring
or the plumbing is uncertain at best. Some
investigation should be carried out to establish the extent of any reconstruction
work required (and its likely cost) before decisions are made about
retaining that "charming attic" or the "sun-filled sitting room".
This
done, the design process can begin, taking into account circulation,
zoning, orientation, views, materials, lifestyle needs, the form of
the house and of course the budget. It's sometimes useful to think about
the building objectively...as an empty vessel within which your particular
requirements need to be accommodated.
Style
is clearly a matter of individual taste and preference. Many renovators
want to preserve or recreate period details while others enjoy the freedom
of more contemporary materials and spaces. The choice is yours and it
can be worth exploring the possibilities of both approaches.
In
any event, it's important to do your homework first. Objectively assess
the home so you can decide what to keep - don't assume it's condition
or it's adequacy for your needs.
As
far as "doing it yourself" is concerned, that's another story...
Renovator's delights
Q: We have an old home that's had
several additions over the years. Is it possible to renovate it ourselves
to obtain a more cohesive style?
A: Doing-it-yourself
is an Australian tradition that's alive and well, despite the ever-increasing
complexity of the home design and construction process.
Despite its trials
and tribulations (not to mention the legal obligations incurred) many
Archicentre clients give owner-building serious consideration, particularly
if they have the time and the expertise necessary to manage a construction
project.
The conventional approach
to home building and renovation sees a contract established between
the owner and a registered builder. Under the terms of the contract
the builder is responsible for scheduling and supervising the work,
sourcing and managing sub-contractors and arranging the purchase and
supply of materials. Perhaps most importantly, a registered builder
is required by Victorian law to warrant the structure of a building
for a period of 6 years from the completion of the work.
As far as the law
is concerned, owner-builders are deemed to be builders if they take
on the role of a head contractor. Owner-built homes or renovations valued
at more $12,000 cannot be sold within 6 years of completion without
an insurance policy that guarantees the following:
* That all work was carried out
in a proper and workmanlike manner
* That all materials used were of good quality and suitable for the
purpose
* That all work was carried out in accordance with the applicable laws
and regulations
Before issuing a policy
insurers require the building to be thoroughly inspected by an accredited
inspector (such as Archicentre) and given a clean bill of health, including
the identification of any second-hand materials used in the work. Any
apparent defects are noted on the basis that the insurance policy only
covers defects arising after the inspection.
Clearly anyone taking
on the challenge of owner-building needs the ability to not only manage
the construction process but to rigorously control the quality of materials
and workmanship. There are courses available to prospective owner-builders,
there are management systems that can provide step-by-step assistance
and there are savings to be made if you know what you're doing.
As with most areas
of home buying, building and renovating, however, it's important to
understand the process before you make your decisions...if in doubt,
ask an architect.
Out,
damp spot!
Q:
My brick house appears to have rising damp. The most affected area is
the wall outside. A concrete path about one metre wide runs the entire
length of the house - could the path be contributing to the damp problem?
A:
Damp houses can be unhealthy and costly to remedy - knowing more about
the issue can reduce the worry and expense. Most dampness problems can
be cured or minimised by simple remedial work but a few will need substantial
outlays, so it's important to know what you're dealing with.
Rising
damp occurs at the bases of walls. Water accumulating there can "wick
up" through bricks, blocks or stones and through the mortar in which
they are laid. Damp-proof courses are there to block this upward movement
of moisture but they can sometimes be ineffective.
The
most common sign that Archicentre sees of rising damp is a lifted surface
finish. As a wall with rising damp dries, moisture will be drawn to
the surface and find itself trapped beneath the wall lining and coating,
resulting in staining, blistering of the wall coating and eventually
crumbling of the wall lining. Another common indicator is efflorescence
- salt crystalline formations on an external wall surface.
The
causes of rising damp are various, but the problem is usually caused
by a damp-proof course being disrupted, breached or failing.
The minor movements of all structures sometimes cause brittle dpc's
to crack thereby creating a path for wicking moisture. The slate and
mortar dpc's in older brick homes are most likely to suffer, but tar
and sand dpc's can also become brittle enough to crack.
A
change to the conditions at the base of the wall is the most common
reason for a building to develop a dampness problem. Raised garden beds
or paving are a common cause of a dpc breach, particularly if the new
surface level is above the line of the dpc…the best dpc in the world
won't work underground! Dampness caused by poorly-laid paths can be
cured by rebuilding the path below the dpc and by sloping it away from
the house or installing drainage grilles in the path nearest the wall
and connecting to the stormwater.
Blocked
sub-floor vents are another common cause, preventing natural evaporation
beneath a building - removing the obstruction will frequently fix the
problem. Increasing the number of vents will further improve air circulation
and assist the evaporation of wicking moisture.
Repair
of leaking water pipes or drains will eliminate them as a cause of the
problem, but remedying the damage will often require additional effort.
Where
these remedies are ineffective or impossible it may be necessary to
embark on a process of replacing the damp-proof course. There are a
variety of ways of doing this, with the most common being the insertion
of a new membrane or the creation of a chemical damp-poof course.
In
either case, expertise is everything. Get three quotes for any works
and ask for referees…if in doubt, ask an architect.